AdBlocker active?
It seems you are using software to block advertisements. You could help us if you could switch it off when visiting RedZoneClash.org.
The reason is very simple: Advertisements help us running the site, to offer you the game in a good quality for free. So if you like the game, please support us by purchasing a Supporter Account or disabling the AdBlocker on this site.
Thank you very much!
| Main / Bug reporting / Top 100 Rated Teams Search Forum | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Poster | Message |
|
sh8888_blocked
|
posted: 2013-12-11 15:43:27 (ID: 1038) Report Abuse |
|
There appears to be what I would call a 'bug' in the calculations, I suspect Pete will probably call it a 'feature'
Check the following teams, and you'll see what I mean .... Teamname (preceded by Top 100 Rating in brackets) :- (7th) Wisconsin Badgers - stated Overall 73.4% - - > Actual overall 61.3% (19th) Bradley Stoke Collective - stated Overall 71.1% - - > Actual overall 61.4% (30th) NoName - stated Overall 70.1% - - -> Actual overall 59.2% Looks to me as though the figures in the Top 100 Rated Teams are taken from several matches throughout this season (and maybe last season ?), therefore the Rating(s) possibly reflects the previous owners/players of the Team(s) and not the current team owner/players ?? 
|
|
| Quote Reply | |
| posted: 2013-12-11 15:46:31 (ID: 1039) Report Abuse | |
|
the numbers on the teams homepage are taken from the last official game only...while top100 is using the highest rating the team ever had. yes, there is potential flaw when teams are taken over by other owners...
Last edited on 2013-12-11 15:48:00 by pete |
|
| Quote Reply | |
|
sh8888_blocked
|
posted: 2013-12-11 15:52:06 (ID: 1042) Report Abuse |
|
pete wrote:
the numbers on the teams homepage are taken from the last official game only...while top100 is using the highest rating the team ever had. yes, there is potential flaw when teams are taken over by other owners... Would it be possible to make the procedure more 'realistic' ? i.e. it doesn't make sense to show new teams with 70%+ Ratings, when they clearly haven't got that Rating (yet) ..... couldn't the calculation look at the highest rating the team ever had with the current Owner ?? btw ... this situation will only get worse (i.e. magnify) over time. Quite soon, the top teams will be over 80% Rating .... new teams are approx 60% rating. Therefore, if a 80% team goes Bot and is taken over by a new owner ... it will be in the first few places of the Top 100 Rated teams even though in reality it's only a 60% team. Just doesn't seem logical to me. Last edited on 2013-12-11 16:00:54 by sh8888 |
|
| Quote Reply | |
| posted: 2013-12-12 09:09:59 (ID: 1044) Report Abuse | |
|
logical vs possible vs performance...have to check that
|
|
| Quote Reply | |
| posted: 2013-12-16 11:37:51 (ID: 1047) Report Abuse | |
|
Changed...
|
|
| Quote Reply | |
| reply Mark this thread unread | |
| Navigation: |< >| | |
| Main / Bug reporting / Top 100 Rated Teams | |
